Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,546
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
As relevant here, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion and granted the City's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm by Mike Aylward
  NEW MEXICO:  Sudden (Not) In United Nuclear Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am by Kiran Bhat
United States and its progeny. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:09 pm by Corynne McSherry
But the EO’s provisions either don’t help, or introduce new and even more dangerous problems.Section 4(c) says, “The FTC (Federal Trade Commission) shall consider taking action, as appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to prohibit unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce, pursuant to section 45 of title 15, United States Code. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:56 pm by Laurence Tribe
  Similarly, to effectuate broad federal drug regulations, the Court held in Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]