Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
But today’s decision was not a total loss for the EPA, however, as the Court also concluded that it was reasonable for the EPA to interpret the Act to allow for the regulation of GHG [greenhouse gas] emissions from sources already subject to regulation under the PSD and Title V [large stationary source] program. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:17 pm
Lyle Denniston explains Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:52 pm by Colin O'Keefe
The Supreme Court’s Greenhouse Gas Permitting Decision – What Does It Mean? [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm by Bart Torvik
The Supreme Court issued another statutory interpretation opinion today in UARG v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
Scalia discusses the Court’s 2007 in Massachusetts v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:33 pm by John Timmer
The roots of this decision date back to 2007, when the Supreme Court ruled in a case now referred to as Massachusetts v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:20 pm by Allison C. Smith
Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) regulation of stationary source greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under two Clean Air Act permitting programs - New Source Review Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 11:07 am by Lyle Denniston
Justice Scalia announces opinion in Utility Air v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:20 am by Allison Smith
Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) regulation of stationary source greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under two Clean Air Act permitting programs – New Source Review Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:58 am
EPA (greenhouse gas regulation), Noel Canning (recess appointments), McCullen v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 6:31 am
"Based on its rulings on the zoning by-law infractions and the illegal site alteration, the Court made several injunctive orders restraining the respondents from continuing their illegal uses of the properties.Read the decision at: The Corporation of the Township of Uxbridge v. [read post]