Search for: "Harris v State"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 5,192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2009, 7:04 am
State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm
Hobby Lobby and Harris v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
Facts: This case (Quantum Fitness Corporation et al v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
At ACSblog, Ann Hodges analyzes Tuesday’s oral argument in Harris v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:30 am
The Court referenced the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
In the case of Florida v Harris, (Oral Argument Transcripts) a valid traffic stop for driving with an expired registration tag resulted in a warrantless search of the defendant's truck. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:48 am
In The Plastic Surgery Center v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 5:31 pm
It’s like the insurer stating “WE DID IT, BUT WHAT’S YOUR CASE WORTH UNDER ONTARIO LAW? [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 7:52 am
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:30 am
UNITED STATES In Padilla v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:00 pm
The decision, UPMC Braddock v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:27 am
Two days ago, in Hayes v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
” That case decision, Pamela Harris v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 8:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:31 am
See Unifund CCR Partners v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm
” The Complaint is captioned: State of Washington v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 5:34 pm
On Thursday, those malign efforts paid off for Obama and Reid as the DC Circuit agreed to an en banc review (all of the judges rehearing the case after it is initially decided by a three-judge panel) of the July 22nd ruling in Halbig v Burwell that the IRS may not issue subsidies to those who purchase health insurance plans through the federal insurance exchange known as Healthcare.gov – because the plain text of the law specifies that subsidies are available on exchanges… [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 7:25 am
The case is Hetronic International, Inc. v. [read post]