Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 3,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2007, 3:05 pm
Scott v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 2:53 am
To the extent plaintiff argues that defendants did not sufficiently emphasize his ownership in the 47BH account, the argument is unavailing, since an insufficient emphasis would be, "at most, a mere error in professional judgment not rising to the level of legal malpractice" (see Geller v Harris, 258 AD2d 421, 421 [1999]; Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467 [1998]). [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 3:42 am
To the extent plaintiff argues that defendants did not sufficiently emphasize his ownership in the 47BH account, the argument is unavailing, since an insufficient emphasis would be, "at most, a mere error in professional judgment not rising to the level of legal malpractice" (see Geller v Harris, 258 AD2d 421, 421 [1999]; Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467 [1998]). [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 7:47 pm
By Eric Goldman Moreno v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 2:01 pm
Harris v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:34 am
Aditya Bamzai, of Ortiz v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 3:59 pm
On Tuesday, November 28, the Court will hear argument in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
The publishers will pay all of Prince Harry’s legal costs, plus around £300,000 extra in damages. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 6:54 am
LEXIS 75005, June 17, 2011) and dismissed as frivolous an inmate's claim that he needed a vegetarian diet for religious reasons.In Harris v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 4:30 am
Corp. v 151 E. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 11:03 am
Cabinet for Health and Family Services v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:33 pm
This is consistent with the logic of Mathews v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:24 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 5:42 pm
Harris, 171 N.C. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 5:42 pm
Harris, 171 N.C. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 12:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
Harris v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 3:55 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania explained in United States v. [read post]
