Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 82,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2016, 5:22 pm
Supreme Court held that the dismissal of jurors without stating a valid cause for doing so may not be used to exclude jurors based solely on race. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:22 pm
Supreme Court held that the dismissal of jurors without stating a valid cause for doing so may not be used to exclude jurors based solely on race. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 4:34 am
”) In Pollock v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:58 pm
Can an advisor be held liable for the false statements of another? [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:10 am
KBBI News reports that an Alaska state trial court judge yesterday in Hunt v. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:24 pm
Gulf-Inland, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
The court held that the state failed to present sufficient evidence to meet any of the three prongs of the strict scrutiny test. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
The court held that the state failed to present sufficient evidence to meet any of the three prongs of the strict scrutiny test. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 8:24 pm
In a 5-3 decision, the Texas Supreme Court yesterday in State of Texas v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:21 am
State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 10:38 am
On February 28th, the Virginia Supreme Court held that a disclaimer was required under the state's advertising rules when posting results on a website. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 12:54 pm
In County of Hawaii v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 7:42 am
State v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:46 am
State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 1:40 pm
Later, in a second petition for state postconviction relief, Cone raised the claim that the State had violated Brady v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am
On January 30, 2013, the court held a hearing to determine Brown's competency to stand trial in his criminal cases, focusing on his mental health. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
DeBernardis v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:02 am
Steven Sanchez v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
Reviewing the trial court's grant of the governmental entities' motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim, the Court of Appeals held that the Circuit Court for Baltimore City was correct as a matter of law when it found that the state-created danger theory did not apply in Maryland or, even if applicable, did not apply under the circumstances of the case and that a special relationship did not exist between the appellees and the Dawson family. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:40 am
Circuit issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
