Search for: "Hong v. Hong"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,291
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2011, 11:59 am
As with the original Summit experts from Australia, China, Hong Kong, (special administrative region of China), Japan, Korea (South), the United States of America and, the United Nations participated. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am
The Hong Kong Law Reform Commission proposed the introduction of a tort of invasion of privacy in the following terms: “any person who, without justification, intrudes upon the solitude or seclusion of another or into his private affairs or concerns in circumstances where the latter has a reasonable expectation of privacy should be liable under the law of tort if the intrusion is seriously offensive or objectionable to a reasonable person. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 11:57 pm
(IP Dragon) Why could Polo Ralph Lauren/Burberry clone get trademark in Hong Kong? [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
Antonious v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
Zatarain’s, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
City University of Hong Kong (Sem 63) Pepperdine Univeristy v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:00 am
Tracfone Wireless, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:48 pm
Geoffrey Lin (Hogan Lovells) described his personal involvement with the Chint v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:25 am
., Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
But in Aaron v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
– FCAFC decision in Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd v Overliese (IP Whiteboard) Caribbean Carribean IP: Establishing an arbitral tribunal for the region (IP Watch) Canada Petition launched in opposition to CETA (Michael Geist) Clerical error in the Intellectual Property Office: Repligen Corp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 11:50 am
Last week in Ward v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 8:54 pm
The case of Altman v. [read post]
