Search for: "Hong v. Kong"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2009, 7:09 am
Nortel’s LTE patents (IP finance) Toronto Star considers ethics of downloading music you already own (Michael Geist) Canada – Copyright Reform Respect and reality are keys to reform (Jeremy de Beer) Tracking the copyright consultation roundtables: Fair dealing emerges as top issue (Michael Geist) Tracking the copyright consultation submissions: 25-30 July 2009 (Michael Geist) Writers’ Union of Canada Chair on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Olivier… [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 3:19 am
Australian Communications and Media Authority v Mobilegate Ltd A Company Incorporated in Hong Kong [2009] FCA 539 '); //--> [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Why becoming generic might be good for a trade mark (IPKat) Good old days of counterfeiting in Hong Kong? [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 3:08 am
The items in question were on their way from Hong Kong to Colombia -- neither of which are countries within the European Union -- and it was during a brief transitory stop at London's Heathrow Airport that they were inspected and found to be fakes. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 6:52 am
Secondly, he said many countries including Fiji, South Africa, Canada, whole of Europe, South Africa ,Hong Kong have decriminalised the same sex conduct. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
’ – discussion of Julian Gyngell’s talk on ‘Phonewords and Finance’ (IP finance) The return of IP securitisation (IAM) Global - Patents Improve your chances of obtaining a patent at a reasonable cost and time by demonstrating the ‘wow factor’ in the application (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Global - Copyright 13 July - Conference examines copyright-related challenges facing reading-impaired community (WIPO)… [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 6:47 am
X took no steps to establish significant ties in Hong Kong that would show that he intended to live there permanently. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 10:02 pm
The latter have minor significance here given the poor drafting and the Mitsui principle of construction [".. the poorer the quality of the drafting, the less willing the court should be to be driven by semantic niceties to attribute to the parties an improbable and unbusinesslike intention, if the language used, whatever it may lack in precision, is reasonably capable of an interpretation which attributes to the parties an intention to make provision for contingencies inherent in the work… [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:04 am
(a Hong Kong-based company) and IGE U.S. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 12:53 pm
References to Hong Kong, Fiji, and Nepal decisions in Naz Foundation are particularly important because they remind the reader that gay rights aren't some luxurious western construct. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 2:08 am
In this respect, Naz Foundation is in stark contrast to the extensive discussion of legal history in the case it cites so extensively, Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 2:05 pm
South Africa was there earlier, and several other such decisions, including one by the highest court in Hong Kong, are cited in this case. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
D2009-0218, the Complainant is Research in Motion, the owner of the registered marks for BLACKBERRY (U.S. and Canada) and BERRY (Hong Kong). [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 6:33 am
" Plaintiff further admits that he gave a copy of the cost sheet to Erlbaum but believes that plaintiff provided it to Erlbaum after plaintiff recovered from the surgical procedure he underwent after his January trip to Hong Kong. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 1:13 am
In a recent decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Apple & Eve, LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:17 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property
Hong Kong Sauce Maker Awarded $82,964 Treble Damages for Counterfeiting of Its Hoisin Sauce
Koon Chun Hing Kee Soy & Sauce Factory Ltd. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:36 am
One case concerned a child of divorced parents who lived in Hong Kong. [read post]
18 May 2009, 7:57 am
Another case to watch: Pietrylo v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:00 am
(At Last... the 1709 Copyright Blog) Section 230 immunity: Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
