Search for: "House v. Close" Results 1021 - 1040 of 7,514
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Last week, White House spokesman Josh Earnest conspicuously did not rule out unilateral presidential action to close Guantanamo: Q    What’s the current thinking on the ability to keep that promise given the Republicans’ control of Congress and their steadfast opposition to closing it? [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 9:17 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
Namely, would a reasonable person have felt free to terminate the interrogation and leave provided that the interrogation environment presents the same coercive pressures as the station house interrogation that was at issue in Miranda v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 7:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Smith v Smith, --- F.3d ----, 2020 WL 5742023 (5th Cir., 2020) Colin David Smith filed a petition under the Hague Convention asserting that Sarah Elizabeth Smith wrongfully removed their children from Argentina to Texas. [read post]
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:52 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Here in the States, we have a three day weekend, and I will be busily working on home projects and thinking about braving the crowds at the little beach by my house. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Dave
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:13 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
 Later in the session, I realized she was listening closely and taking notes. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 10:20 pm by Matthew Hill
Louisa Watts, a 106 year-old resident of Underhill House, a care home owned and managed by Wolverhampton City Council, challenged the Council’s decision to close the home and move her to alternative accommodation. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 7:56 am by Ronald Mann
ShareWednesday’s argument in Babcock v Kijakazi will take the justices deep into the intersection of the Social Security Act and a host of statutes defining the obligations and compensation of National Guard workers. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 2:13 am
Today the United Kingdom's Court of Appeal (Civil Division) released its judgment in AS & DD v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which concerned the lawfulness of the deportation of the applicant to Libya, pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding with the proposed receiving state. [read post]