Search for: "IN RE VIOLATION OF RULE 50" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
If the case involves a closely held New York business corporation and you're seeking judicial dissolution based on 50/50 deadlock or minority shareholder oppression, the rules laid out in Article 11 of the Business Corporation Law require you to file a "special proceeding" consisting minimally of two documents: (1) a petition and (2) an order to show cause (OSC). [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:56 pm
Turner entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving his right to appeal the suppression ruling. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:14 am by Gregory Forman
Husband then filed a motion in the family court to enforce the 1999 support order, or in the alternative, to modify it pursuant to Rule 60(b)(5), SCRCP, so that Wife’s share of his military retirement would be limited to 50% of the portion he accrued during the parties’ marriage. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:32 pm
And yet, as Justice Kennedy notes, there has been no flood of Tumey claims.2) Why do the dissenters draw the line at Tumey and In Re Murchison (the 1955 contempt case)? [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court voted 6-2 to rule that domestic assault can be grounds for restricting gun ownership. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:36 pm by Tia Sewell
More than 50 D.C. and Capitol Police officers were injured during the Trump supporters’ riot against the results of the 2020 election, according to NPR. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 9:25 am by Joe Mullin
The Senate Judiciary Committee also passed an amendment that purported to protect end-to-end encryption from being violated by the states. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 5:00 am by Lisa Monaco
Most importantly we must impose costs—and keep the costs coming—when those norms are violated. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:10 am by Gregory Forman
Inc., the United Supreme Court required a West Virginia Supreme Court Justice’s recusal where that Justice had received $3 million in campaign contributions from Massey Coal’s CEO and then ruled favorably for Massey Coal in overturning a $50 million damage award against the company. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am by Aaron
Because of this ambiguity, the dissent argued that the rule of lenity should apply and the ambiguity resolved in Mr. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Brinna Ludwig
  WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article for the Yale Law Journal, Monica C. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 12:04 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
The Supreme Court ruled in the case that income taxes on interest, dividends and rents were direct taxes and were, therefore, unconstitutional because they violated the Constitutional provision that direct taxes be apportioned. [read post]
” The U.S. withdrawal from the treaty ex post facto has no impact on the ICJ ruling, however. [read post]