Search for: "Ilya Shapiro" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
 Commentary comes from Damon Root at Reason.com; from Lisa Heinzerling, who at ACSblog discusses the implications of the decision for the Environmental Protection Agency’s climate rules; from Lisa Soronen at the NCSL Blog, from LeRoy Goldman in the Asheville Citizen-Times, from Ilya Shapiro at CNN and Time, from Jody Freeman at Harvard’s Environmental Law Program, from Simon Lazarus in the New Republic; and from Jonathan Cohn at the Huffington Post. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Amy Howe
In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration may be required), Ilya Shapiro and Thomas Berry look back at the Court’s opinion in Evenwel v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 2:46 am by Scott Bomboy
” The CATO Institute’s Ilya Shapiro saw the Murphy decision as reinforcing several potential states-rights issues. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro discusses the argument, finding the apparent sympathy for the church across the ideological spectrum “surprising, because if indeed the case is headed to a 7-2 resolution, then it would’ve been 6-2 without Gorsuch and there was no need to hold it for so long. [read post]
31 May 2022, 3:18 pm by Dale Carpenter
Joining us as amici were Ilya Shapiro (formerly with the Cato Institute), the American Unity Fund (AUF), and the Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute (HLLI). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
  The court’s sole black justice was telling us that the Confederate battle flag still means something”; from Ruthann Robson, who at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog observes that the decision “could have wide-ranging effect”; from Ilya Shapiro, who at Cato at Liberty argues that the Court’s decision “has offended the freedom of speech” and that “now we know that the First Amendment is one thing that’s smaller in… [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Ilya Shapiro at Cato at Liberty summarizes what he regards as a current split among the federal circuits over the issue and explores potential reasons for the Court’s decision to deny cert. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At Cato at Liberty, Ilya Shapiro discusses the amicus brief that Cato filed in support of a petition challenging the Supreme Court’s requirement that regulatory takings claims first be exhausted in state courts. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and David McDonald discuss Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Ilya Shapiro writes at The Federalist that the decision “set a precedent that one president’s executive action can’t be rescinded by the next president unless he jumps through hoops that his predecessor didn’t have to[; t]hat’s a recipe for ever‐​expanding federal and executive power, to the detriment of our constitutional system of government. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for USA Today, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on the decision, which he describes as  “[p]robably the most misunderstood case in modern legal history. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
Josh Blackman’s blog and Ilya Shapiro at Cato@Liberty also discuss the Court’s rejection of a balancing test to determine whether speech is categorically unprotected. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am by Amy Howe
United States, where a defendant was convicted of violating Sarbanes-Oxley’s ‘anti-shredding’ prohibition by throwing illegally caught fish off his boat”; Ruthann Robson at Constitutional Law Prof Blog, who summarizes the case as one in which, “[i]n a nutshell, the Court concludes that the federal prosecutors exceeded the power the statute gave them . . . and thus there is no need to decide whether Congress exceeded the power the Constitution’s treaty and… [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Thomas Berry urge the court to grant review in a case involving a challenge to a California law that requires family-planning clinics to inform their patients about state programs that provide free or low-cost access to family planning services that include abortions; they argue that “[c]ompelling licensed professionals to speak the government’s message is dangerous” because “it… [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Meggan DeWitt urge the court to review a challenge to a “mandated disclosure regime[]” in California that “stretch[es] the First Amendment to the breaking point regarding commercial speech. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Amy Howe
” In another post at Cato, Ilya Shapiro and Julio Columba discuss the amicus brief that Cato filed in support of the appeal brief in a Texas voting rights case. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and David McDonald discuss two amicus briefs filed by Cato – one in support of a cert petition challenging California “commercial-fishing license fees that require nonresidents to pay several times more than residents” here, and another in support of a petition contesting Minnesota’s “unfettered confinement of sex offenders” here. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:28 am by SHG
  *Much as the name “Resistance Police” might implicate all the horrifying and exhausting trauma that infects its creators, it struck Cato’s Ilya Shapiro as a good name for a band. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Thomas Berry urge the court to review a case in which the appeals court affirmed a “class certification, accepting the plaintiff’s theory that a single proof of illegal structuring would prove a fraud against every one of [the defendant]’s salespeople”; they argue that “it is dangerous to hold that someone can be liable for fraud without ever having made a misrepresentation. [read post]