Search for: "In Re Kent"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
If you’re interested, read my post analyzing the legal issues potentially raised in the letter here. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:56 am
You’re having a larf…… doesn’t exist in Britain – there are pragmatic and, sometimes, politically convenient limits. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 9:37 am
., who isn't seeking re-election [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 8:08 am
If you're one of us, you know how we feel; if you're not, I'm not sure you want to know.Some people make the mistake of separating the game from all the stuff that surrounds the game and therefore can't see what's the big deal. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:03 am
Buccafusco: We’re thinking about testing this. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
"We're not seeing any evidence that these foods are unsafe and more animals are getting sick. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:18 am
Yesterday afternoon, I had the pleasure of seeing one of those vulgar new Rolls Royce cars waft by with the number plate XXX TAT……Res ipsa loquitur. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:56 am
The “Hot News” doctrine provided some protection for organizations that first reported a news event from those who would re-use the reportage, sometimes even exploiting technology to “scoop” the original reporters. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 3:29 am
Douglas, and now they're fighting to see how far she can be pushed. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:42 pm
., Judge Samuel Kent. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
When the Levine, Riegel, and Kent cases were briefed in the United States Supreme Court, we provided our readers with “users’ guides”/”guided tours” that summarized the defense side arguments and pointed out whatever we thought was interesting.Today we’re continuing that tradition with the Bruesewitz (sooner or later we’ll memorize how to spell that) v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:18 am
Someone has to tell the judges how to do this right, and you're the ones in a position to do that. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:05 am
HOLLAND WASHINGTON – You have the right to remain silent, but only if you tell the police that you're remaining silent. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 2:49 pm
They're dumb and crazy. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 2:38 am
That's all well and good, but does that mean you're now safe from online shenanigans? [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:35 pm
As reported in Investment News, according to John Gannon of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in Washington, seniors fall for these investments because the name makes them sound as if they're risk-free; in fact the principal isn't always protected, as holders of notes backed by Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. learned when the firm collapsed in September 2008. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:48 pm
• If you’re going to do China, know China. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
“We’re wasting their money. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 10:42 am
To show how outrageous it is that these infections occur, Medicare has classified CRBSIs as “never events” (meaning they’re preventable) and will no longer reimburse hospitals for the costs they incur due to these kinds of infections. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
Circuit Judge Kent A. [read post]
