Search for: "In Re Levine" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,877
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2011, 10:54 am by Michael McCann
The event is open to the public, so if you're in the Sacramento/Bay Area, it sounds like a great event. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:00 am
Levine, the same battle may soon come front and center on the drug side.Stay tuned. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by William McDonald
” WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent article in the Vanderbilt Law Review, Allison M. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:57 am
Bybee, Assistant Attorney General, Re: Interrogation of al Qaeda Operative (Aug. 1, 2002), and with the previous uses of the technique, as they have been described to us. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 5:41 am
Senator Lucio, for his part, won't discuss the contracts except to say they're of "modest" size and to deny wrongdoing. [read post]
26 May 2011, 4:41 am by SHG
  They aren't being bold, or even misogonystic; they're being babies trying to bluff their way through hormonal insecurities, scared to death that the girls whose interest they so desperately seek to attract will realize that they're just little boys.And the girls who get all bent out of shape over such infantile antics are just as immature and insecure. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 4:41 pm by Russell Knight
” (In re LaPinska (1978), 72 Ill.2d 461, 473.)'” In re Levin (1987), 118 Ill.2d 77, 87, quoting In re Crisel (1984), 101 Ill.2d 332, 343. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 7:49 am by Gritsforbreakfast
"We have about 17,000 low-level drug possession offenders in our Texas prisons right now," Levin said. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:07 am
Now, we've said before that we're quite happy with the facts in Wyeth v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In Levine, as we've mentioned, there aren't any allegations of violations at all. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), are examples of this), when they work to the advantage of our clients’ customers, we're usually content.There’s a little more. [read post]
21 May 2009, 4:35 am
The 2006 Preemption Preamble was dealt with in Levine, and we don't use it anymore anyway.Our concern is whether the directive to review and revise preemption language will become an excuse to change non-preemption-related aspects of regulations - we're thinking primarily of the FDA's 2008 CBE regulation changes, but there are undoubtedly others - where the FDA brought the regulation in line with its stated original (pre-Bush) intent, but also included statements… [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:04 am by Nassiri Law
Here, the case, In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, being heard in the U.S. [read post]