Search for: "John Doe, Inc."
Results 1021 - 1040
of 5,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
How does that differ with net zero energy buildings? [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 9:54 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:13 pm
Cisco Systems, Inc. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:03 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
"Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 5:36 pm
This case concerns Chris Parent, Shawn Phillips, John Simon, Timothy Putzier and John Parah. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 2:04 am
Hall & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 10:32 pm
By JP Ellison & John W.M. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:00 am
The plaintiffs, Lamar Bigsby Jr. and Karla Freeland, brought this putative class action alleging violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”) based on predicate acts of mail fraud and wire fraud, and related state-law claims against the defendant Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc., and various John Doe defendants. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 4:44 am
See, e.g., the Board's 2004 decision in favor of registrability of MOSCONI for billiard equipment (TTABlogged here), and this year's refusal of WATSON for laboratory software (here).Text Copyright John L. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 4:47 am
"TTABlog note: For additional discussion of this issue, see Section V of the article "The TTAB in 2007: Rules, Rulings, and Repurcussions," co-authored with Ann Lamport Hammitte.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 5:14 pm
"The Board therefore affirmed the refusal to register.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:21 am
It seems obvious that the design element was the reason that Applicant got the registration.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:45 am
Myriad Genetics, Inc., Court watchers and college students alike took to Twitter to react to the news. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 7:09 pm
You be the judge.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 1:00 am
"Therefore, the Board affirmed the refusals.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 8:23 am
Clayton County, Georgia and Altitude Express Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:28 am
A Section 18 claim for restriction or modification of a registration does not have to meet those requirements, but it does have to meet the "avoidance of a likelihood of confusion" requirement.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 3:46 pm
John D. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:56 am
Retail Fish Inc. v Todtman, Nachamie, Spizz & Johns, P.C. [read post]
