Search for: "John Does, 1-2" Results 1021 - 1040 of 10,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2009, 7:23 am
September 4, 2009) (2-1): According to the allegations of his first amended complaint, Plaintiff-Appellee Abdullah al-Kidd (al-Kidd), a United States citizen and a married man with two children, was arrested at a Dulles International Airport ticket counter. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 5:45 am
" Subtract one person from that list; a New Yorker identifying himself as John Doe, who clever people quickly outed as businessman Jeffrey Lemerond, has now filed a lawsuit, claiming that he was humiliated by his appearance in the film. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 12:31 pm by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Indianapolis, Indiana – Attorneys for Plaintiff, Michel Keck of Jefferson Township, Owen County, Indiana, filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Defendants, John Mark Lawrence d/b/a Mark Lawrence Art Gallery of Alpharetta, Georgia, and DOES 1 through 25 infringed numerous pieces of artwork. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 10:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Though Jane Doe had consented to have sex with one of the boys (hereinafter John Doe II), she was unaware that two other boys (hereinafter John Doe III and John Doe IV) had switched places with Doe II. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 3:08 am
Carlson's dogged efforts, the Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of the mark URBANHOUZING in standard character form for "real estate brokerage; real estate consultation; and real estate listing. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 10:52 am by Rob Merges
Oren has a number of interesting things to say, but his critique has two main points: (1) the conservative bias of midlevel principles; and (2) the fuzzy nature of midlevel principles, a product of their origin in a (hypothetical) consensus-building procedure. (1) The conservative bias: I think there are two senses of "conservative." [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 7:46 am
This argument reasons that (1) the free speech principle protects the communication of ideas (the major premise); (2) pornography communicates no ideas (the minor premise); (3) therefore pornography is not protected by the free speech principle. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
[2] We conclude that the offence does not require proof that the accused’s threats were conveyed to their subject or that someone was actually intimidated by them. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:00 am
Besides, I'm from the South Side of Chicago, and I don't do farms.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am by MBettman
The incident that the agency alleged was solely sufficient for denial of placement (1) never resulted in a conviction, and (2) never resulted in the termination of Jody Johnson’s parental rights. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:33 am by John Jascob
The court noted that he conceded that Section 78m(b)(2), (5) is not one of the fraud statutes listed in Section 1514A(a)(1) and is not a “provision of Federal law relating to fraud against shareholders. [read post]