Search for: "Johns v. Johns" Results 1021 - 1040 of 33,733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2014, 5:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
In their innovative defense of originalism, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport maintain that the text of the Constitution should be adhered to by the Supreme Court because it was enacted by supermajorities — both its original enactment under Article VII and subsequent Amendments under Article V. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:31 am by Dan Ernst
This article examines the many ironies of Marbury v. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm by Howard Bashman
And today at that blog, Neil Siegel has a post titled “In Defense of the Chief Justice’s Execution of His Responsibilities in NFIB v. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
We have just learned that the RIAA's "John Doe" case targeting University of Michigan students, LaFace Records v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:14 pm by Lawrence Solum
Kamp (The John Marshall Law School) has posted Ricci v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:35 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Family Child support; contempt Karen Pinto appeals from an order modifying child support, denying her interest on child-related expenses owed by John Harold, and denying her attorney fees because John was not in contempt for his failure to pay. [read post]
21 May 2007, 12:50 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens chides divided three-judge Ninth Circuit panel for deciding case by means of an unpublished opinion: See Justice Stevens' opinion concurring in the judgment, in which Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined, in the case captioned Los Angeles County v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 7:49 pm by Ilya Somin
Those who think that Kennedy is sympathetic to liberal jurisprudence forget his opinions and votes in cases like Citizens United, NFIB v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:23 am by Gerard Magliocca
One final note–Bingham’s ante-bellum argument was consistent with Barron v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 10:52 am by Andrew Hamm
John Wiley & Sons is here; the transcript in Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]