Search for: "Johnson v. Texas" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(Managing Intellectual Property) (Law360) (Out-Law) ECJ rules German music distributor cannot sell two Bob Dylan compilation albums because Sony owns rights to songs in question: Sony Music Entertainment (Germany) GmbH v Falcon Neue Medien Vertrieb GmbH (IPKat) (Law360) ECJ: Date set for Advocate General’s opinion in L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika… [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 9:37 am by Eric Goldman
To answer the dissent’s question: No, it’s not hard, yet it’s apparently still too hard for far too many services. * * * Johnson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:10 am by Scott Bomboy
Johnson, the Oregon city has issued three ordinances related to camping and sleeping on public property. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
It’s hard to tell, but Johnson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
  The decision in Reidel v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 10:16 am by John Floyd
  Evidence of Prior Sexual Abuse Committed by Complainant/Victim   On May 25, 2016, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (TEX CRIM APP) in Johnson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
Johnson signed into law the Voting Rights Act of 1965, on Aug. 6 of that year. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 11:24 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am by Dennis Crouch
Johnson Gas Appliance Co., 917 F.2d 1574, 1583 (Fed. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:09 am by R.J. MacReady
However, I do think it's kind of ironic that Judge Cochran starts off with quotes from the dissenting opinion from Abdul-Kabir v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
If that rings a bell for you, it’s either tinnitus or because the Court already invalidated the Armed Career Criminal Act’s residual clause in Johnson v. [read post]