Search for: "KNIGHT V. STATE"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm
In a December case, United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 5:45 am
Sanders v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 5:10 am
On Thursday, the Court will consider a petition, filed by the ACLU and the Knight Institute, asking the Court to revisit Snepp v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am
The Knight First Amendment v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am
” The Second Amendment returns to the Supreme Court Less than two years after their landmark decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
Heller and in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:36 pm
Manuel Cepeda Vargas v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:22 pm
Herring Networks v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 6:04 am
Hong KongHKSAR v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
By way of example, see Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 9:02 pm
Of course, that isn’t the standard under local, state, or federal antidiscrimination laws. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:22 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:12 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
The decisions of Judge Colin Birss QC in the Patents County Court earlier this year in Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Knight (noted by the IPKat here and here) made fascinating reading. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 11:36 am
See Knight Textile Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 6:58 am
Contributed to a Supreme Court filing in Malwarebytes v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:00 am
Tatjana V. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 11:36 am
See Knight Textile Corp. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:56 am
The Ninth Circuit emphatically rejected the state action argument in PragerU v. [read post]