Search for: "Kelly v. State"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 2,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York… [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:10 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 9:43 am
Failinger Denying the Poor Access to Court: United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Kelly (06-11622) noted that they did not dissent from the Court's action. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 12:35 am
In Nord v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
This is a judicial review which is something of a sequel to Kelly & Mehari v Birmingham CC (our report, bailii transcript), and as with that case, deals with apparent gatekeeping by Birmingham City Council. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
This is a judicial review which is something of a sequel to Kelly & Mehari v Birmingham CC (our report, bailii transcript), and as with that case, deals with apparent gatekeeping by Birmingham City Council. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Kelly (1970). [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 3:42 pm
Kelly Issue: Whether 28 U.S.C 2254, the federal habeas provision governing claims adjudicated on the merits in state court, should be applied to claims based on evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel the state court refused to consider. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
By Kelly McClure In Waldrop v. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 12:29 pm
” Kelly v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:52 am
Toole v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 9:15 am
While the English v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 3:57 am
Great Seats, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:04 pm
Accordingly, the court concluded that prejudice must be presumed under United States v Cronic, 466 US 648; 104 S Ct 2039; 80 L Ed 2d 657 (1984). [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:43 am
See Baxter v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit erred when it affirmed the exclusion of the petitioner’s expert rebuttal testimony regarding his future dangerousness in violation of Kelly v. [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:39 am
" NFP civil opinions today (4): Kellie J. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 5:14 am
On April 1, 2006, Soto and Amaro repeated the scheme at Kelly Power Sports in Danvers, Massachusetts. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:41 am
" State of Indiana v. [read post]
