Search for: "Knight v. Knight" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,786
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2008, 11:58 pm
In addition to lack of temporal and spacial proximity, the recent SCC case of Mustapha v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:05 am
Knights, 534 U.S.112, 121, 122 S.Ct. 587, 151 L.Ed.2d 497 (2001). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
When these “dark knights of Wall Street,” as a recent Law360 Expert Analysis article called them, succeed in driving down a stock price, aggressive securities plaintiff attorneys heed the bat signal and litigate against the affected issuer when they may not have done so otherwise.[1] After all, the defendant company may not have publicly disclosed anything at the time when the activist short-seller decided to launch a faux-fraud campaign to profit from their short position. [read post]
4 May 2017, 3:07 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
            On March 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Czyzewski v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 3:07 pm by Thompson & Knight LLP
            On March 22, 2017, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Czyzewski v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 11:29 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
It’s a game of two halves Four games into my local Man v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 2:23 pm by Richard Posner
  I don’t want to give an exaggerated picture of the consequences of Knight-Keynes uncertainty. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Michael C. Smith
with paternal advice from Bruce Sostek of Thompson Knight and a certain local counsel for a successful result on behalf of our client Pier 1 Imports in the Alexsam v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
However, as Frank Pasquale [1] rightly suggests in his thoughtful foreword, this is also “a collection that should be read by a wide range of audiences both in and around the legal profession” (p v). [read post]