Search for: "LEVEL 2 DEVELOPMENT, LLC" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
The debate being played out across the globe presents many challenges, and it will be interesting to review further developments with this proposed right in future. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 7:28 am by Kevin LaCroix
This article: 1) Provides some background (including some legally relevant technical details) about the Capital One data breach; 2) Discusses the oddly co-dependent relationship between Capital One and AWS; and 3) Analyzes the potential liability issues arising between the two. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:01 am by Sam Conforti
  Sam Conforti of law firm Sam Conforti LLC said, “The new industrial espionage no longer is the tourist taking a factory tour and clicking away with his or her camera. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:22 pm by H. Scott Leviant
  Here, the certification order was necessarily provisional in that it was subject to development of a trial plan that would manage the individual issues surrounding the outside salesperson exemption.In general, when a trial plan incorporates representative testimony and random sampling, a preliminary assessment should be done to determine the level of variability in the class. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Even after holding all time-constant, location-level variables in place, we find that introduction of the DRS is associated with elevated perceptions of informal procedural justice and interactive justice, but diminished perceptions of formal procedural justice. [read post]
4 May 2022, 3:37 pm
Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLC (2012) 55 Cal.4th 223, 236 (Pinnacle); Sellers v.Just Answer LLC (2021) 73 Cal.App.5th 444, 461 (Sellers).) [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
        The exact nature of the duties and liabilities of corporate officers who are not directors is a subject that has received little attention from courts and commentators. [1]  Many cases which relate to the duties and liabilities of corporate fiduciaries explore whether negligence and breach of care claims are protected by the business judgment rule and the courts that have spoken have done so mostly in terms of its application to decisions or judgments of… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:32 am by Kara OBrien
The following is our monthly featured post from Terry Nelson & Peter Fetzer of Foley & Lardner filling you in on the latest SEC developments. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:23 pm
Amchan issued his decision July 28, 2006. *** Anchor-Harvey Components, LLC (33-RM-373; 352 NLRB No. 140) Freeport, IL Aug. 29, 2008. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
Austria The Austrian Data Protection Authority (DPA) has held that Google Analytics breached Art 44 GDPR by failing to provide an adequate level of protection to the transfer personal data to Google LLC in t [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
This presumption applies to disputes about (1) the scope and content of the prior art; (2) differences between the prior art and asserted claims; (3) the existence of motivation to modify prior art references; and (4) the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 12:00 pm by Jason M. Halper
Capital LLC; (2) permitted fiduciary duty claims against the directors to proceed based on allegations related to the deal protection mechanisms in the merger agreement, including termination fees potentially payable to HIG of up to 13% of the equity value of the transaction; and (3) dismissed a claim against HIG for aiding and abetting the board’s breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Vercammen Law
 Rooming House Act did not apply to Assisted Living Facility here ESTATE OF JAMES BURNS, by and through BRIAN BURNS, EXECUTOR,v CARE ONE AT STANWICK, LLC d/b/a CARE ONE HARMONY VILLAGE AT MOORESTOWN and CARE ONE, LLC,SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISIONDOCKET NO. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
Minority Discount In contrast to the marketability discount, which applies at the enterprise level, the minority discount applies at the ownership level and, as described by Judge Fahey, “reflects the fact that the price an investor is willing to pay for a minority ownership interest in a business, whether a corporation or a partnership, is less because the owner of the minority interest lacks control of the business. [read post]