Search for: "LONG v. HARRIS"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 2,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
This year, in Harris v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 9:23 am
’)” Moseley v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:55 am
Harris, 786 N.W. 2d 409 (2010) alluding to the holding there that a factual basis besides gender may justify a sentence when gender is considered. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Redistricting Law Refined Tuesday, July 19, 2016 | Daniel Tokaji The Supreme Court case, Harris v. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 7:55 am
Losing on federal preemption after 4 years of fruitless litigation is extremely embarrassing for Kamala Harris’ office. * Campbell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
Harris, supra.] [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
’” In terms of the long view of Supreme Court history, wasn’t the progressive spirit of the Warren Court – exemplified in decisions such as Brown v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 3:07 am
Maryland Long ago, back in 1963, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Brady v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:59 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 11:49 am
In Garrison v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:46 am
First, Roe was first and foremost a victory for doctors, whose rights, Justice Harry Blackmun later suggested, were the real objective of his opinion. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:54 am
In Passmore v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Hawkins was affirmed by an equally divided court, to everyone’s great surprise since it involves the treatment of spousal guarantors under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, consideration of which normally induces hysterical blindness long before people can form an opinion of it. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court ruled 4-3 in Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
See Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 8:00 am
See Brown v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
Dr Harry Sweeney and the stud farm he runs in Japan have initiated three actions separately suing University of Limerick and two students. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Many commentators, including members of Congress and presidents, criticize judicial rulings as being influenced by improper philosophies or even by improper desires to protect partisan interests—think, for example, about the criticism of the conservative majorities in Bush v. [read post]
