Search for: "Law v. Phillips"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 2,757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2010, 5:57 am
Phillips . . . did not read the warrant. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 10:24 am
Although it didn’t call it that, the concept of “sex plus” discrimination was first adopted by the United States Supreme Court in a 1971 decision involving Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, in the case of Phillips v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Keynote address by Carter Phillips; articles by Susan Rose-Ackerman, Edward Rubin, Cynthia R. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 5:28 am
Applying Phillips Petroleum Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 4:29 am
People v Phillips, 7 Misc 3d 1004 (County Ct, Lawrence County 2005): The defendant did not possess a "billy" when he was found to have a "collapsible baton." [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm
Benjamin Pell’s Media Law Quiz of the Year, 2014: The Answers The answers to each question are underlined. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:57 am
” As the UKSC Blog notes in their review of The Supreme Court in 2010: Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:05 am
Phillip Thompson discussed that dissent in excruciating detail a few years ago in a very interesting law review article. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 11:04 pm
(Part IV, Part V, and Part VI). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 am
In 2019, in Rucho v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
The journalist, Rhodri Phillips, is the nineteenth “Sun” journalist arrested in recent months. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am
Katz, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Palo Alto, CA Right now we’re in a complete mess; nobody knows what the law is. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 4:29 am
Panasia Estates, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:40 pm
The Court granted a Motion for Protective Order yesterday in Delhaize America, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:22 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:15 am
This proposition is - again - uncontroversial in light of Douglas v Hello!. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 1:35 am
The common law in this area is capable of further development. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
Know of any media law events happening in June / July? [read post]
