Search for: "Long v. Williams" Results 1021 - 1040 of 4,805
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2006, 5:45 pm
I guess, in retrospect, that I must’ve inhaled them - they didn’t last long. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 6:49 am
Partnership Co. v Warrington, 283 AD2d 376, 377; Rotanelli v Madden, 172 AD2d 815, 817), as well as the contents of the I-R Mobile and William Scotsman contracts (see, Daniel Gale Assocs. v Hillcrest Estates, 283 AD2d 386, 387; Sofio v Hughes, 162 AD2d 518, 519; Avanta Bus. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
On 17 May 2023, the Court of Appeal issued the costs order [pdf] in the long running Banks v Cadwalladr case ([2023] EWCA Civ 219). [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24 v.… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee (24 v.… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
Media law news this week was dominated by the Tulisa privacy injunction and the long-awaited judgment in Flood v Times Newspapers. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:17 am by James Bickford
Responses to last week’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Relatedly, some members of today’s Court who have great respect for Chief Justice William Rehnquist (the author of a very relevant concurrence in Bush v. [read post]