Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 1021 - 1040 of 4,049
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am by Louise Pearce
The Supreme Court On 24 January 2018, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Hodge, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Briggs heard the appeal in the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Indeed one of the articles falsely claimed that it had been stated at the meeting that “Israel should be wiped from the map”. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 3:42 am by Brian Cordery
The principles to be applied to such inventions have been summarised by the House of Lords in Kirin-Amgen and Lundbeck. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Raphael Murillo
In response to the dramatic expansion of the Spanish Crown during Emperor Charles V’s reign, elites in the court and the Emperor himself typically employed inspections as a means of collecting records and reports. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Indeed, not dissimilar to Lord Mance’s emphasis on the Claimant’s family life in the Supreme Court case of PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd in the context of privacy claims, the judgment in AXB v BXA serves to illustrate that the Court will continue to place great emphasis when the Claimant’s family members, in particular spouses and young children, are also plainly adversely affected by both the Defendant’s course of conduct and the publicity that… [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:14 am
  As the the Court themselves stated:"We are conscious that in so deciding we are arriving at a conclusion which is different from that of an experienced patent judge. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice was heard on 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:39 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The first was the United States, which is composed of states united into one mass or body, although all agree that entry into the union does not deprive a state of its distinct and individual existence. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 8:23 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Wilson, Reed and Hughes unanimously held that they had jurisdiction to hear the appeal because the outcome in Sala was plainly incorrect. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Lord Lloyd-Jones found that B’s situation fell into the category of case Lord Dyson had in mind in Lumba where a person’s detention pending deportation ceases to be lawful no matter how grave the risk of absconding or the risk of serious offending. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am by INFORRM
  Others are more sinister, like when former senior Ulster Unionist Lord Kilclooney described the Irish prime minister Leo Varadkar as ‘the Indian’. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am by CMS
Cathryn Houston, trainee solicitor at CMS, considers the case of Navigators Insurance Company Limited and others v Atlasnavios-Navegacao LDA (formerly Bnavios-Navegacao LDA), which is due to be heard by the UK Supreme Court on Tuesday 20 March 2018: On 20 March 2018, the UK Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, Lord Briggs) will hear this appeal relating to the interpretation and… [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:38 am by CMS
In Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Group plc v Customs and Excise Commissioners [2001] EWCA Civ 1476 we had Lord Justice Sedley describing the world of VAT as “a kind of fiscal theme park in which factual and legal realities are suspended or inverted”. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Wilson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 5:49 am by alysondrake
” Image via Wikipedia.One of thirteen total children to an English lord, Margaret Brent and several of her siblings immigrated to the new world to better their own fortunes. [read post]