Search for: "MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A J R"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,716
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Blending science, culture, compassion and philosophy with legal precedent, Justice Matthew F. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
., Ott, J., Musmanno, J.) [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
., Ott, J., Musmanno, J.) [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
J 11/87 [3.3, 3.6]; J 27/94 [8)) and is not allowed to reverse these acts so that they can be considered as never filed (J 10/87 [12]; J 4/97 [2]).On the other hand, the Boards of Appeal considered that R 88 acknowledges as a further legal value the desirability of having regard to true as opposed to ostensible party intentions in legal proceedings (T 824/00 [6]) in appropriate circumstances. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
The court’s decision will mean that blood-alcohol concentrations of 0.08 or greater will be enough for a guilty verdict in criminal court, as well as prove an indispensable legal weapon in civil cases in which DUI accident attorneys such as Gregory J. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 6:00 am
J., 339, 340, 359 (2009).) [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
It thus became a matter of desperation. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
If Congress has the power to exempt religious groups from a law, then, once a group qualifies under the statutory exemption, that must be the end of the matter. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
R. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 5:08 am
by J. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
Philip J. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
In 2004, it adopted a domestic partnership law (discussed here), which allowed same-sex couples to register for a status that came with some, but not all, the benefits of marriage. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Under the Uniform Parentage Act, which California has adopted by statute, biological mothers and “presumed parents” have parental rights. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
By Christopher J. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 3:52 am
On July 27, 2010, Judge Toko Serita issued an oral decision, adopting the J.H.O.' [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 10:26 am
R. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 3:59 pm
This Court is not at liberty to adopt an interpretation so at odds with the fundamental rules of statutory construction. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:38 am
As discussed here, in June 2012, Central District of California Judge R. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
It provided, in Section Two, that states could not be forced, as a matter of full faith and credit, to give effect to same-sex marriages from sister states and, in Section Three, that the definition of marriage for federal-law purposes is a union between a man and a woman. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 6:18 am
BEST,EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OFNICKOLAS J. [read post]
