Search for: "MATTER OF J C B" Results 1021 - 1040 of 3,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The appellants submitted, in respect of Mitting J’s findings on proportionality, (a) that he had been wrong in his conclusion that the Order was “rationally connected” to the legitimate aim (b) that the Order was unduly draconian in the light of the need for minimum interference, and (c) the procedural deficiencies also impact on proportionality (a) Rational Connection and Proportionality This part of the appeal was dismissed. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit 2015) (Gorsuch, J., concurring). [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:49 am by Norman L. Eisen
” Jefferson County v Acker, 527 U.S. 423, 447 (1999) (Scalia, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:18 am by INFORRM
  The PSI point was dealt with by Vos J who, after fuller citation of authority, reached the same conclusion as Mann J ([2011] EWHC 349 (Ch)). [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
The U.S. appointed Julie Bédard and Canada named Mark C. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Engagement problem b/c audience expects high quality. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
  Arnold J found that several uses of 'OCH Capital' infringed the registered trade marks under Article 9(1) (b), concluding that there was a 'manifest likelihood of confusion'. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 6:21 am
Fox (Columbia Law School), on Friday, February 9, 2018 Tags: Adverse selection, Capital formation, Crowdfunding, Disclosure, Equity offerings, FAST Act, Investor protection, IPOs, JOBS Act, Liquidity, Registration exemptions, SEC, Securities regulation, Small firms, Solicitation The Enduring Allure and Perennial Pitfalls of Earnouts Posted by Gail Weinstein, Robert C. [read post]