Search for: "MINISTER v. STATE" Results 1021 - 1040 of 4,031
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2020, 5:11 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal will consider whether a decision to make an interim custody order under art.4 (1) Detention of Terrorists (Northern Ireland) Order 1972 was rendered invalid by the fact that it was made by the Minister of State and had not been considered personally by the Secretary of State. [read post]
The test for determining such an issue was recently authoritatively stated by the Supreme Court in the case of McInnes v HM Advocate 2010 SLT 266. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:06 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/1/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:43 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Bryan Heaney
The petitioners didn’t make the Human Rights Act argument in the Inner House but they did refer to the judgment of Sachs J—the eminent South African judge and human rights champion— in Christian Education South Africa v Minister of Education (2001) 9 BHRC 53. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 3:44 pm
For the State Department list, which can be found on the State Department website and in the Federal Register, see here. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:14 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 23/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard… [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Family Law Week reports upon the CPS and Another v Gohil case - see below.Government supports Thurrock in tackling violence against womenA new strategy to tackle violence against women and girls has been launched in Thurrock by Victims and Equalities Minister Helen Grant. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Note the headline assertion that British business is failing to protect innovation, then read on, says Jeremy.* Dutch Minister trumps Court of Appeal ruling, reasserts EPO immunityFollowing to the last events of the battle over the European Patent Office's governance, the Dutch Minister of Justice intervened with regard to the EPO's immunity from execution of court orders under international law, Merpel recounts.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that Member States are… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:14 am by Kingsley
Due to these concerns including the ones raised by the media (see here, here and here), INEC issued a press release which was also reported here and here, stating  its own position on the judgment. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:32 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 10/01/2022) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021. [read post]