Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 1021 - 1040
of 21,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
In Maier, it was stated: “[78] … the court must then consider a notional and fair use of that mark in relation to all of the goods or services in respect of which it is registered. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
On February 29, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Kurns v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
Von Holdt v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:56 pm
Mark Levy was well known and highly respected for his successful appearances before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 5:08 am
I have written three posts on this blog (here, here, and here) about the case of Mark Jensen. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 11:44 am
” Finch v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Today marks the 87th anniversary of the landmark Olmstead v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 1:58 am
Ltd V Aiwa Corp in the UK High Court. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 11:21 am
This 2-1 decision in Vanegas v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:51 am
Jose Cuervo S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 7:47 am
The post Trademark Butter Battle: Kerrygold v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 2:33 pm
Vachani, the Aaron Swartz prosecution and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 7:38 pm
In Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 3:49 am
This morning the General Court (GC) held that the latter is the correct approach in its decision in La Mafia Franchises v EUIPO, T-1/17.BackgroundIn 2006 an application for registration of the ‘La Mafia se sienta a la mesa’ in the Nice classes above was filed, and the trade mark was registered in 2007.In 2015 Italy filed an application with the EUIPO for a declaration that the contested mark was invalid in respect of all of the goods and services for which it… [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
In Cuban v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:46 am
When the response was that all of this missed the point, missed the mark of what the decision-makers would focus on, the reply was “no way. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:16 pm
The Second Circuit today revived Starbucks' Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA) claim against the mark CHARBUCKS, but affirmed a judgment, entered after a bench trial, dismissing Starbucks' federal infringement and New York state dilution claims.In Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:22 pm
But they also could mark the beginning of the Supreme Court’s strike against the administrative state. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:55 am
On March 18, Texas will mark the 50th year of Gideon v. [read post]
