Search for: "Matter of C. F. v C. M." Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
The Counterargument of Judges Brown and Kavanaugh In a 2010 case, al-Bihani v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:13 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
(iii) That the risk of the petitioner repeating the act of operating a motor vehicle while impaired by, or under the influence of, alcohol or controlled substances or a combination of alcohol and a controlled substance or repeating any other offense listed in section 303(1)(d), (e), or (f) or (2)(c), (d), (e), or (f) of the act is a low or minimal risk. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am by John Palley
(f) Sunset Not To Apply- (1) Subsection (a) of section 901 of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 is amended by striking ‘this Act’ and all that follows and inserting ‘this Act (other than title V) shall not apply to taxable, plan, or limitation years beginning after December 31, 2012. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Napster, 239 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2001); Viacom v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Canadian homeowners, residents, industry, regulators and appellate courts really do need certainty on the following key issues: (i) the threshold effect for liability m nuisance m the context of environmental or contamination; (ii) the requirements for a “non-natural” use ofland; (iii) whether environmental statutory regimes are a complete code of liability; and (iv) whether property devaluation should be a recognized claim in nuisance. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
1 Though I’m encouraged that opponents of the existing bills recognize the harm that online commercial piracy causes creators, I think the OPEN Act resembles too much the latter. [read post]