Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 1021 - 1040 of 3,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2011, 1:58 am
However, Tuesday was the day that Verica Trstenjak delivered her Opinion in Case C? [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
Berry was not represented in the family law matter creating additional challenges. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:01 am by Mayela Celis
The Working Group to develop draft provisions on matters related to jurisdiction in civil or commercial matters,  including  rules  for  concurrent  proceedings,  to  further  inform  policy  considerations  and  decisions  in  relation  to  the  scope  and  type  of  any  new  instrument. b. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 7:54 am by familoo
  The case being appealed There were two children - N and M. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 7:59 am by Sonya Hubbard
Sperling), and more than $1 million to relocate Sean B. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
Danielle B., 158 A.D.3d 767, 71 N.Y.S.3d 549 [2d Dept. 2018] and Matter of Christopher YY. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
There are also some very interesting statements on a possible case of partiality of an OD member and on how ODs should (or should not) be composed.[2] The contested patent has been revoked for containing subject-matter that extends beyond the content of the application as originally filed (A 100(c)). [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 1:23 pm by Santiago A. Cueto
” The original or a duplicate of a foreign record of regularly conducted activity that would be admissible under Rule 803(6) is self-authenticating if accompanied by a written declaration by its custodian or other qualified person certifying that the record (a) was made at or near the time of the occurrence of the matters set forth by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge of those matters; (b) was kept in the course of the regularly conducted… [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Supreme Court observed that the Automatic Orders are codified within DRL § 236(B)(2)(b). [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 9:28 am by privacylawyer
Paragraph (c) covers a broader range of observation or recording, but where it is done for a sexual purpose. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:46 am by Robert Chesney
That means any such operation must be authorized as a separation-of-powers matter—either in the sense that it is within the inherent Article II authority of the commander in chief (either as a matter of national self-defense or, perhaps, as a matter of authority that lies below the threshold of the constitutional meaning of “war”), or that some other statute (like an AUMF) covers it. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In the same way, decision T 240/04 [16.3] already stated as regards new claims not sufficiently connected to the subject-matter of the one previously filed: “In einer solchen Situation den neuen Antrag zuzulassen würde einem Patentinhaber praktisch die Möglichkeit geben, nach Belieben eine Zurückverweisung an die Erstinstanz zu erzwingen. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
§ 13-2928(C): creating a crime for an unauthorized alien to solicit, apply for, or perform work.Section 6 of S.B. 1070, A.R.S. [read post]