Search for: "Michigan v. Long" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,474
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Home Ownership and the New Deal Order”Doug Genens, UCSB, “Legal Services and the War on Poverty in Rural California”Commentator and Chair: Tom Sugrue, New York UniversityTax and Fiscal History as Cat Scan of Post-New Deal Order Elliot Brownlee, UCSB, “The New Deal Order and Beyond: The Fiscal Issues”Isaac William Martin, UC, San Diego, “The Tax Revolt and the Fall of the New DealOrder”Joseph Thorndike, Tax Analysts, and Ajay Mehrotra, American Bar… [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  First, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm by Roger Clegg
And we found law, undergrad, and med-school discrimination even at the University of Michigan (before voters banned it) – and indeed worse undergrad discrimination than there was in the system that the Supreme Court struck down in Gratz v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Delaware Court Questions Disclosure-Only Settlement of Merger Objection Lawsuit:  As discussed here, in a July 8, 2015 decision in Acevedo v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 8:27 pm by Alfred Brophy
 Aubrey Strode, the state's lawyer in Buck v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 9:51 am by Douglas A. Berman
Thanks to a few helpful readers, I learned about a very interesting split panel ruling today from the Michigan Court of Appeals in Michigan v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
”[56] Other long-term problems include the risk for hypertension, proteinuria (abnormal amounts of protein in the urine that can portend a decline in renal function), and reduced kidney filtration rate.[57] Since the longest available follow-up studies of HUS victims are 25 years, an accurate lifetime prognosis is not really available and remains controversial.[58] All that can be said for certain is that HUS causes permanent injury, including loss of kidney function, and it requires… [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Our High Court ruled that so long as Michigan's sentencing process requires trial judges to make findings of fact to which a defendant does not confess or that a jury did not determine beyond a reasonable doubt, that process was unconstitutional.Scrapping the sentencing guidelines, the Supreme Court further mandated that sentencing judges must now treat the sentencing guidelines as "advisory only". [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Supreme Court, on June 29, 2015, in a 5 to 4 ruling, held in Michigan v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm by anbrandon
With apologies for the rather cursory discussion, here's what you missed if you took a long weekend:United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 11:32 am by Megen Miller
Yesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court released a unanimous decision in People v Stevens, __ Mich __; __ NW2d__  (July 23, 2015) (Docket No. 149380), where it reversed a defendant's conviction for second degree murder and child abuse and remanded to the trial court for a new trial because of the trial judge's improper conduct that "pierced the veil of judicial impartiality. [read post]