Search for: "Michigan v. United States" Results 1021 - 1040 of 3,260
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2013, 1:01 am by Jack Chin
Fletcher, a well known scholar of federal Indian law, is Professor of Law at the Michigan State University College of Law. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 12:42 pm by Orin France
The Proclamation states that, after consultation with the Director of Homeland Security and the Attorney General, and based on their assessment of threats against the United States from nationals traveling from the seven enumerated countries, “entry should be subject to certain restrictions, limitations, and exceptions. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:33 pm by Melissa Tatum
A bit tardy, but I wanted to congratulate Matthew Fletcher, Wenona Singel, and the rest of the Michigan State Indigenous Law and Policy Center on a fabulous and informative conference. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:22 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court of Rhode Island, Providence. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Coates
These territories (present-day states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and part of Minnesota) were essentially colonial possessions of the United States, and some American politicians favored treating them as such. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 1:46 pm by WIMS
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> DE Department of Natural Res. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm by Hannah J. Kraus
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion established in Roe v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether criminal defendants whose assets have been frozen have a right to a pretrial hearing to challenge the basis for the charges against them so that they can use the assets to hire their counsel of choice. [read post]