Search for: "Miller v. State of California" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Warning Causation - Greatest Hits
8 May 2008, 12:22 pm
This prescriber testimony was uncontroverted, so the defendant won, despite the state-law presumption.Odom v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
First District Rejects Laundry List Of CEQA Challenges To EIR For Mixed Use 5M Project In Downtown San Francisco
5 Apr 2019, 11:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  Citing to and quoting from its decision in California Oak Foundation v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fifth District Holds Issue Exhaustion Not Required Where Agency Gave No Notice of Intent To Rely On CEQA Exemption Prior to Hearing, And Existing Facilities Categorical Exemption Does Not Apply to Unlined Landfills As A Matter of Law
23 Aug 2021, 4:42 pm by Arielle Harris and Arthur F. Coon
  City of Los Angeles etc. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Flunking CEQA’s “Fair Argument” Test: Third District Affirms Judgment Upholding MND for El Dorado County Bridge Replacement Project, Rejects Arguments Based on Alleged Significant Impacts on Fire Evacuation Routes During Construction As Insufficient To Require EIR
21 Jun 2021, 8:55 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing California Building industry Assn. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Relist Watch
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-6381, is another in a long line of petitions involving the retroactivity of the Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
First District Holds EIR’s Analysis of “No Project” Alternative To City of Livermore Residential Development Violated CEQA By Failing To Discuss Feasibility Of Purchasing And Preserving Habitat-Rich Garaventa Hills Project Site, Also Addresses Significant Issues Involving Exhaustion Doctrine And Adequacy of Mitigation
4 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Save the Hill Group v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Attitudinal and Doctrinal Takeaways from the Masterpiece Cakeshop Case
14 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Alan E. Brownstein
One of the most contentious cases of the Supreme Court’s term has been Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Sleeper Case, Sleeper Issue
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
Miller, 389 U.S. 429, 442 (1968) (field preemption involves "a domain of exclusively federal competence") (emphasis added). [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
“For the Record”: Fourth District Holds CEQA’s “Mandatory” And “Broadly Inclusive” Administrative Record Statute Requires Lead Agency To Retain Documents Within Its Scope And Not Destroy Them Prior To Record Preparation
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Golden Door Properties, LLC et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Vitamin C Claims Preempted
5 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm by Michelle Yeary
            We first happened upon Loreto v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
The First of Many Expected Five-Four Rulings at the Supreme Court this Term: Clapper v. Amnesty International USA Rejects Plaintiffs’ Standing to Challenge Foreign Surveillance
28 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
  The case, Clapper v. [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
Petitions to watch | Conference of 01.07.11
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am by Christa Culver
California Pharmacists AssociationDocket: 09-1158Issue(s): (1) Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement to providers may be held preempted by § 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the… [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
News You Can Use Digest – January 21, 2022
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
ExxonMobil is asking the Texas Supreme Court to allow it to use the law, known as rule 202, to pursue legal action against more than a dozen California municipal officials. [read post]
Lobby Comply Blog - https://stateandfed.com/lobbycomply/feed
Fourth District Upholds EIR For Cadiz Mojave Desert Groundwater Pumping Project Against Various CEQA Challenges
17 May 2016, 9:57 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Center For Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Bald-Faced Attempt to Manipulate Venue Rejected
1 Jul 2021, 10:28 am by Dennis Crouch
 Miller & Lux, Inc. v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
CAFA's Revolving Door?
4 Feb 2008, 8:23 am
Boyar & Miller, P.C., No. 06-1936, 2007 U.S. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Attorney Labor For Preparing CEQA Administrative Record Is Recoverable Cost Where Specialized Knowledge Required, Holds Fourth District in Partially Published Opinion
1 Oct 2014, 11:29 am by Arthur F. Coon
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Rejects CEQA Challenge To San Diego’s Use of Existing Facilities Categorical Exemption For Mission Beach Amusement Park Lease Amendment and Extension
22 Jan 2019, 11:38 am by Arthur F. Coon
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Relist Watch Returns
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Tool Without A Handle: Taking Space Seriously
28 Oct 2017, 2:04 pm by Chuck Cosson
   The hiQ v. [read post]
Stanford Center for Internet and Society Blogs - http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog