Search for: "Monroe v. Monroe"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,424
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Take, for instance, the case of Aranki v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:30 am
In the recent case of Utility Service Co. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:58 pm
Supreme Court has called “the Blackstone of Military Law” and repeatedly cited in Hamdan v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
The latest case from Monroe County was no exception.In Stout v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
BRADY OUTLINE (March 23, 2011)by Jill Paperno, Special Assistant Monroe County Public DefenderBRADY V. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 10:03 am
DuBrin, Special Assistant Monroe County Public DefenderThe Court of Appeals has just decided an important decision on what a defendant must do to preserve his claim that a period of unreadiness is not excludable from the 30.30 calculation. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 6:23 am
In a recent case, Hammond Ex Rel v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:08 pm
Mapp v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:14 pm
The Supreme Court of Missouri’s decision in Utility Service Co., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:21 am
The Court of Appeals affirms.The case is Filozof v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:31 am
This comes from the Tennessee Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:34 am
County of Monroe, 2011 WL 534047 (February 17, 2011). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:53 pm
In the post-Koken decision of Bridgeman v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:21 pm
” In Turner v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:21 pm
” In Turner v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:26 pm
According to the Fourth Department in People v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
" Scenario #2 is drawn from Adams v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:41 am
County of Monroe (50 AD3d 189 [2008], lv dismissed 10 NY3d 856 [2008]) and is patently without merit. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:36 pm
DuBrin,Special Assistant Monroe County Public DefenderIn People v Prindle (_NY3d_, 2011 NY Slip Op 01320 [2/22/11]) Mr. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:24 pm
DuBrin, Special Assistant Monroe County Public DefenderIn People v Farkas (_NY_, 2011 NY Slip Op 01318 [2/22/11]), the Court of Appeals decided a very important 30.30 case - against the defendant- but in so ruling confirmed principles that will often help defendants seeking to move to dismiss a superseding accusatory on 30.30 grounds. [read post]
