Search for: "O’CONNOR V. STATE" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,822
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice OConnor, Justices French, Fischer, and former Justice DeGenaro* * Justices French, Fischer, and DeGenaro would have accepted both propositions of law. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 11:58 am by Christopher J. Walker
Ilan Wurman, Associate Professor, Arizona State University, Sandra Day OConnor College of LawProf. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:57 am by James Bickford
Meanwhile, new video is now available of interviews with the Justices: Linda Greenhouse speaks with retired Justices Sandra Day OConnor and David Souter here, while C-SPAN interviews Justice Kagan. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 6:44 am by Adam Chandler
According to a report by the Associated Press (via the Chicago Tribune), retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day OConnor – who has long been critical of judicial elections – is scheduled to speak today in Iowa at a panel discussion that is intended as a response to a campaign to remove three Iowa Supreme Court justices who supported a decision that legalized gay marriage in the state. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 7:27 am by MBettman
  Joining Justice Pfeifer in the majority were Chief Justice OConnor, and Justices French and ONeill. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 4:41 am by Amy Howe
”  Finally, at CNN, Joan Biskupic looks back at Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s path to the Court thirty-five years ago and suggests that it “demonstrates how a long-odds nominee gets skillfully positioned to enjoy the luck of presidential selection. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 6:18 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case   Yes: Justices Kennedy, French, Fischer, DeWine, Donnelly, and Stewart No: Chief Justice OConnor Key Precedential Case in this Appeal Allstate Ins. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Of the 10 cases in which the claimant succeeded in 2011, there were 4 against Mr Kordowksi, and 3 assessments of damages in the absence of the defendant (Al-Amoudi v Kifle and Cooper v Turrell) or where the defendant was in person (Clynes v OConnor). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by James Bickford
” Briefly: Retired Justice Sandra Day OConnor sits for an interview with Rebecca Lowe of the International Bar Association and reveals her preferred epitaph: “Here lies a good judge. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 8:15 am by Sean Wajert
  The petitioner argues that the analysis in Justice O’Connor’s concurring opinion in Asahi is the better view; first, it embodies the requirement of active engagement, of personal agency, that the Supreme Court has made the centerpiece of its formulations of personal jurisdiction limits under the Constitution. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 11:15 am by Sean Wajert
  Under Justice O’Connor’s view, placement of a product into a stream of commerce with awareness that it may be carried into a forum state would not, by itself, be adequate for the exercise of jurisdiction over a defendant. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm by Richard Kahlenberg
In Grutter, Justice Sandra Day OConnor said it is permissible to use race to achieve a “critical mass” of minority students to promote the educational benefits of diversity, but never suggested that it was appropriate to seek racial representation at universities with reference to a states demographic makeup. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:50 am by B.W. Barnett
  The whole thing is apparently a figment of Justice O'Connor's imagination. [read post]