Search for: "Paris v. State"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,256
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2011, 10:24 am
Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:51 am
The correct answer is “Supreme Court decision in Young v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:39 am
He relied in particular on the judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda in Prosecutor v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:10 am
In the 1969 Presidential election when Indira Gandhi gave the call for conscience vote, resulting in the election of V.V.Giri, the Supreme Court held in Shiv Kripal Singh v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 7:31 am
BR-UK is a law firm of Solicitors and Registered Foreign Lawyers authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales, and registered with the Paris Bar pursuant to the 98/5/EC Directive. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:20 am
BR-UK is a law firm of Solicitors and Registered Foreign Lawyers authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales, and registered with the Paris Bar pursuant to the 98/5/EC Directive. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 4:39 am
In essence, characteristics of ownership need to be present for a state of slavery to exist. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
(IPBiz) US Patents – Decisions CAFC reverses DNH in Markem-Imaje Corporation v Zipher; Newman partially dissents (IPBiz) District Court Nevada: Plaintiff need not produce licenses involving unasserted patents where licenses involving patents-in-suit have been produced: Bally Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm
The seat of arbitration was Paris but the hearings were held for convenience in London. 27.05.2002: The award was passed in May 2002. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
”The difficulty here is that many states, having refused to legislate in favour of text and data-mining, are presumably not convinced of their merit. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
This stems from a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board decision in Crocker Bank v CIBC, 223 U.S.P.Q. 909 (T.T.A.B. 1984), the correctness of which is open to doubt. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 7:30 am
In the 2015 Paris Agreement, Article 8 acknowledged the importance of L&D and the accompanying decision 1/CP.21 extended the WIM mandate, yet Paragraph 51 of the same decision stated that Article 8 provided no basis for climate-related liability or compensation. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 1:09 pm
[v] That still leaves open the question of the funding of the defence of the derivative claim. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 4:40 am
While the decision of Morgan v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 10:09 pm
In today’s case (Snow v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:31 pm
In OOO Memo v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:41 pm
Khan v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:54 am
A separate protective provision may make sense in a later round of financing where the investor is also receiving a senior (as opposed to pari passu) liquidation preference. [read post]
