Search for: "People v Dollar"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 4,622
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm
In Raincoast Conservation Foundation v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:19 pm
2016—By a vote of six to four (in Wesby v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 1:08 pm
Reports indicate that a motorcycle and a car collided along the roadway at the intersection with Avenue V. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
Appellee claimed more than $1 million dollars in damages. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 2:13 pm
Part of having transparency in the tax code is having the people’s representatives decide if there will be a tax increase. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 8:14 pm
Approximately 90% of Canada’s canola seeds, oil and meal are exported, worth $2.7 billion dollars a year. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 7:54 am
In Qualcomm v. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 6:09 am
Aside from the tax issue addressed herein (and people used to say 1/3 for the husband, 1/3 for the wife and 1/3 for the government – though the numbers never actually worked that way), what is the justification for giving the income earner more than the recipient in light of Crews v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:55 am
Three months ago, this Kat discussed the Feilin v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:31 am
In 2015, the Montana legislature established the program, which provides a dollar-for-dollar tax credit of up to $150 for individuals and businesses who donate to private scholarship organizations. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am
By the end of World War II, over 40 percent of Americans smoked cigarettes, but today, millions of people are giving up cigarettes and only 13.7 percent of the population smokes regularly.[1] Some former smokers have substituted cigarettes with electronic cigarettes, oral smokeless tobacco, or other tobacco-free nicotine products. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:23 am
The bill would raise the wage to $10 by September 30, 2021 and then increase it by one dollar every year until the wage reaches $15 in 2026. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 4:01 am
” The court concluded: There is no contested issue for which a hearing is required (Goodman v Lovett, 200 AD2d 670, 670 [2d Dept 1994]). [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
And Humphreys busied himself ordering multiple people arrested people for failing to swear allegiance to the Confederate States of America. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am
Trump is manifestly right.Third, the court of appeals' (and DOJ's) reading would mean that tens or hundreds of thousands of people who didn't purchase health insurance were lawbreakers as of January 2019, even though that manifestly wasn't Congress's intent or design--and it would also mean that countless members of Indian tribes and indigent individuals who couldn't afford coverage have been recklessly and audaciously breaking the law for more than five years… [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:01 am
People v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
But that many people "could" be affected doesn't create a public benefit if there's no showing the many people actually are affected. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 12:08 pm
Indeed, the one nonprecedential decision I could find, National Socialist White People's Party v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am
[xii] Local governments may feel that they are losing their share of tax dollars by failing to effectively regulate this new industry. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 10:12 am
[xii] Local governments may feel that they are losing their share of tax dollars by failing to effectively regulate this new industry. [read post]
