Search for: "People v. Doctor"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 3,525
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2010, 7:12 am
Justice Kennedy laid it out in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 7:19 am
v=JQY6IlMopk0 The Yaz story is a good lesson for all those “anti-frivolous lawsuit” zealots out there. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:34 am
The Florida Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in McCall v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:34 am
The Florida Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in McCall v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am
The much-anticipated decision in NT 1 & NT 2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) was handed down on 13 April 2018. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:06 am
In Lindo v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 7:44 pm
Maryland v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
The 5-3 opinion in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 9:51 am
In Orgeron v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 10:43 am
McLaughlin v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 5:59 am
The problem with this approach is obvious, in that many overweight people have tried for years or even decades to lose weight on their own without any success, and that is why they are in this position in the first place. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:36 am
See also my CRFA summary and piece on doctors and consumer reviews. * NYAG: Attorney General James Secures $100,000 from Manhattan Doctor Who Manipulated Online Reviews * Haworth v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:13 pm
The good folks at Drug & Device Law beat me to the 11th Circuit's recent unpublished per curiam decision in Rounds v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 8:09 am
Such a test would give doctors a point of reference in determining whether an athlete who suffered a concussion has recovered fully from his injuries and is able to play again, according to Michael V. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
(Zelig v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 8:27 am
The plaintiffs relied on a case, Romero v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:42 pm
" Shaw v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
The CDC also said young people often do not recognize the signs of stroke. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 10:28 am
Unfortunately, she lost her appeal and the $250,000.00 cap on medical negligence damages remains the law in California (See Stinnett v Tam). [read post]
