Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 19,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2021, 9:10 am
Does it matter how many people are looking? [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:52 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:50 am
”) and In re S.C. v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:35 am
Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:58 am
Case citation: Fakhrian v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
He then worked to boost the posts’ visibility, including: the posts asked users to “follow [his] link and mark it as helpful so that the message is amplified and as many people are warned as possible. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:04 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that insurers must pay for all medically necessary treatment for people with mental illness (Harlick v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
United States, in Trump v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
The Court issued a seemingly simple rule today in Rodriguez v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 4:38 am
Teleflex, the court said that patent examiners and judges need to look broadly at how creative people normally combine ideas to solve problems instead of relying on narrow, rigid tests to determine whether an innovation is worthy of a patent monopoly. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
The long-awaited decision in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334 has brought some badly-needed clarity and certainty to the law of libel, and it seems fair to say that reports of the death of the libel writ have been greatly exaggerated. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
The long-awaited decision in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334 has brought some badly-needed clarity and certainty to the law of libel, and it seems fair to say that reports of the death of the libel writ have been greatly exaggerated. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
The long-awaited decision in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334 has brought some badly-needed clarity and certainty to the law of libel, and it seems fair to say that reports of the death of the libel writ have been greatly exaggerated. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:42 pm
The Medieval Period may be long gone from our history, but there are still some remnants of the dark age of divorce law at work in our courts today. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:43 pm
The American people and our Constitution deserve more from federal courts. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:20 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:30 pm
People v. [read post]
Shoplifting Arrests in New York While Inside a Retail Store: A Review of the New York Legal Standard
17 Jul 2013, 12:15 pm
Where asportation of merchandise is involved, the item(s) 'need not be completely removed from the premises as long as there has been some physical movement and an exercise of dominion and control that it inconsistent with the owner's rights' (People v Jensen, 86 NY2d 248, 255 [Titone, J. dissenting] citing Olivo, 52 NY2d 309), factors which were established prima facie in the information filed herein by the People." [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 6:59 pm
As you know, it has long been held that counsel fails to preserve for appellate review legal insufficiency claims when he has failed to raise the issue in a specific TOD motion (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]). [read post]
