Search for: "People v. Tooks"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 12,208
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am
Under the State Constitution, the Supreme Court is a court of “general original” (i.e., “unlimited”) jurisdiction, meaning it is “competent to entertain all causes of action unless its jurisdiction has been specifically proscribed” (People v Correa, 15 NY3d 213 [2010] [quotations omitted]). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 12:30 am
This question was considered last month by the Upper Tribunal in KS (Thailand) v SSHD [2022] UKAITUR PA090582018 (unreported). [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:06 pm
Yassin v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
From Mumma v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
(Basu v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
The “governed”—the American people (“We the people”)—accept the system and process. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm
Since 1789, the Senate has confirmed 128 nominations to the Supreme Court, but seven successful nominees never took an oath of office to serve on the bench, including some very noteworthy names. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
In most legal orgs, this percentage is near negligible, especially if the org is being honest with itself about (i) how many personnel in putative innovation roles (legal operations, knowledge management, project management) are consumed by active matters, existing programs, and administration, (ii) how much technology spend is maintenance, and (iii) how many projects are purely aspirational with no real resources save the illusory spare hours of already busy people. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:13 am
Yet the decisions took opposite directions. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
It has been hailed as one of the most important civil-rights decisions for people with disabilities. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:45 am
When do people feel free to leave? [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:19 am
Will Jackson provide the reliable liberal vote that many people expect from her? [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
– Roger Parloff, Senior Editor The Jan. 6 Committee It took the Jan. 6 committee a while to get the ball rolling on its public hearings this year: by April 2022, the panel had pushed back the start date for its hearings enough times that Molly Reynolds and I wondered in Lawfare just what was going on over on Capitol Hill. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
An Alabama law that bans gender-affirming care for individuals under 19 years old took effect on May 8, 2022. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:45 am
From Dodge v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:09 am
Manheim Township School District * More Teenagers Mistakenly Think “Private” Chat Conversations Will Remain Private–People v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 7:28 am
The reversal of Roe v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
In doing so, they took the opportunity to quote from Law Society of Upper Canada v Kumarasamy, 2015 ONLSTH 52, a similar case involving a paralegal. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:08 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:03 am
On the first of this month, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued a useful decision, People v. [read post]
