Search for: "People v. Wells" Results 1021 - 1040 of 27,429
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2007, 12:07 am
"... and he said he didn't remember having any, and that people thought, well, he's not being forthright. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by S
Comment The fact that there are insufficient sites for travellers is well documented. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by S
Comment The fact that there are insufficient sites for travellers is well documented. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Affirming the Third Department’s holding, the Court of Appeals held that “this case is not akin to Guzman where the prospective juror confirmed that a sign language interpreter would allow him to follow the proceedings verbatim,” since in Guay, no alternative accommodations were requested or discussed (People v Guay, 18 NY3d 16, 23 [2011]).Along these lines, the Fourth Department noted that “[i]t is well established that ‘[a] juror who… [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 6:05 am by Brian Shiffrin
Thus, in People v Sumter (2009 NY Slip Op 09782 [4th Dept 12/30/09]), the Appellate Division, Fourth Department held that the trialcourt erred in admitting in evidence testimony concerning the seizure of $1,027 in cash from defendant at the time of his arrest, as well as the cash itself. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:24 am by centerforartlaw
This is recorded by historians, as well as the brass plaques that depict European travellers. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 2:41 am by INFORRM
In PJS v News Group Newspapers ([2016] EWCA Civ 100), the court allowed an expedite appeal against the refusal to grant an interim injunction restraining The Sun on Sunday from publishing an article about a well-known entertainer’s extramarital sexual activities. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 5:16 am by Nathan Dorn
Still, there is evidence that invisible people take responsibility in some measure for the national well-being of the countries they inhabit (Kirk, p. 57). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:17 am by SHG
  Oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]