Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 5,844
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2021, 4:36 am
Witten by Orji A Uka (Senior Associate at ALP NG & Co) and Damilola Alabi (Associate at ALP NG & Co) Introduction The issuance and service of an originating process are fundamental issues that afford or rob a court of jurisdiction to adjudicate over a matter. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
" Allison v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm
Available at Westlaw Australia. [5] Alex Mills, Party Autonomy in Private International Law (CUP, 2018) 53, citing Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co v Shand (1865) 16 ER 103. [6] Alex Mills, The Confluence of Public and Private International Law (CUP, 2009), 53. [7] Antony Gibbs & Sons v Société Industrielle et Commerciale des Métaux (1890) 25 QBD 399, 405 (Gibbs). [8] Alex Mills, Party Autonomy in Private International Law (CUP,… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
If employed, the individual is either working in the private sector or the public sector.[3] Excluding the federal government and interstate compact commissions and authorities, if serving in the public sector in New York State the individual is either in the State’s military service[4] or its civil service. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
If employed, the individual is either working in the private sector or the public sector.[3] Excluding the federal government and interstate compact commissions and authorities, if serving in the public sector in New York State the individual is either in the State’s military service[4] or its civil service. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm
And yet girls in this public school are not allowed to wear pants. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 5:00 am
Co. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
To what extent does public policy fit in? [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
Supp. 2d 360, 367 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (holding that “little past dealings” precludes a finding of acceptance through a course of conduct) with Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 10:44 am
The Supreme Court in R v Mann stated that not every encounter with the police will constitute a detention within the guidelines of section 9. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 6:44 am
v=rTChcV6rYFA&feature=youtu.be Free Will Seminars and Speakers Bureau for GroupsSPEAKERS BUREAU At the request of senior citizen groups, unions, and Middlesex County companies and organizations, the " Speakers Bureau " is a service designed to educate citizens about how laws affect their lives and how the judicial system operates. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
They previously were amici in Google v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm
David Lametti, as he then was, before he became a Member of Parliament and then Minister of Justice, were my colleagues, co-counsel and clients in an intervention in the immediate forerunner to the current SCC decision, namely, the case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:05 am
Co., decided in June by Judge Philip Gutierrez (C.D. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 8:36 pm
In Ataellahi v. [read post]
1 Aug 2021, 11:20 am
Minnesota is in the Eighth Circuit, and courts here are guided by the SquirtCo factors (named for the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals’ 1980 ruling in SquirtCo v Seven-Up Co.). [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 8:21 am
It has a membership of over 2000 professional composers and lyricists, and is a founding co-member –along with SGA and other independent music creator groups– of MCNA. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
NYPPL has received a number of requests concerning a 2008 New York State Supreme Court decision that addressed the unilateral diminishing of retiree health insurance benefits by the retiree's former public employer. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
NYPPL has received a number of requests concerning a 2008 New York State Supreme Court decision that addressed the unilateral diminishing of retiree health insurance benefits by the retiree's former public employer. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
NYPPL has received a number of requests concerning a 2008 New York State Supreme Court decision that addressed the unilateral diminishing of retiree health insurance benefits by the retiree's former public employer. [read post]
