Search for: "Quick v. United States" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2016, 4:03 am
Belmora's FLANAXBased on its reading of the Supreme Court’s Lexmark decision, the lower court had dismissed Bayer’s Section 43(a) false association and false advertising claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) and entered judgment on the pleadings as to Bayer’s Section 14(3) claim, ruling that the Lanham Act does not allow an owner of a foreign mark not registered in the United States, who does not use the mark in the United States [Bayer], to assert… [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Meanwhile, a new poll finds that Americans’ perceptions of the United States’ fight against the Islamic State are becoming more positive. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 7:19 am by Andrew Guthrie Ferguson
In an earlier post I mentioned that our LAWn Signs idea had a potential serious legal implication after the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decided United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 7:50 am by Eric Goldman
Photo credit: 3D Quick Link Crossword // ShutterStockCopyright * Naruto v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Quick commentary: This was a dramatically less intense argument (reading from a cold transcript) than in Dollar General. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:25 am by David Cosgrove
[i]United States Department of Labor. (2016, April 13) Department of Labor Finalizes Rule to Address Conflicts of Interest in Retirement Advice, Saving Middle-Class Families Billions of Dollars Every Year [Electronic format]. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm by Douglas Cantwell
Egan seemed to suggest a state has no duty to reassess whether the host state is still “unwilling or unable” as long as the non-state group continues to engage in hostilities that threaten the intervening state. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:38 am by Rory Little
Justice Kagan pointed out that in a prior case (United States v. $8,850, a 1983 forfeiture case), the Court had ruled that “we’re going to do a due process analysis, but we’re going to take the [Speedy Trial Clause] Barker factors as our test. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 9:48 pm by Stephen Page
While the US has full faith and credit meaning allowing the portability of orders made in one particular part of the United States to take effect throughout the United States, each state has its own particular rules to do with family law and often there are different rules that apply from county to county. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm by Stephen Page
The United Nations by contrast deals with public international legal issues. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:42 am by Zack Bluestone
    In other news… United States In a speech at Australian National University, U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 9:33 am by INFORRM
The United States media, in contrast, has long enjoyed immunity from politicians suing over scrutiny of their public conduct. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:07 am by Kent Scheidegger
  At no time was the United States Government or any federal official a party to any action.The particular proceeding that came to the Supreme Court as Medellin v. [read post]