Search for: "Randy Barnett"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2010, 10:09 am
Second, Hudson agrees with co-blogger Randy Barnett that the individual mandate isn’t clearly covered by existing Supreme Court precedent under either the Commerce Clause or federal government’s power to tax. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 12:16 am
Randy Barnett and Ilya Somin have articulated this position particularly well. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:25 am
We also started hosting a debate between outside commentators on McDonald, starting with entries by Douglas Berman, Steven Calabresi, Ilya Shapiro, Jack Rakove, Nelson Lund, and Randy Barnett. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:24 am
Barnett v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 10:22 am
"—Randy E. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:19 am
” At the Volokh Conspiracy, Randy Barnett reports on an event honoring Justice Ginsburg yesterday at the Georgetown Supreme Court Institute. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:42 am
Scholars such as Randy Barnett, Keith Whittington, and Jack Balkin have offered thoughtful proposals for how judges should handle the enterprise of constitutional construction. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:33 pm
But not from Randy Barnett’s Constitutional Law: Cases in Context.So is the power to order people to engage in commerce with certain corporations “incidental” to the enumerated power “to regulate Commerce . . . [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
"] Randy Barnett and I have written a new essay, titled Coping With a Court One Disagrees With. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:42 pm
Randy Barnett has tried to do that with a few broad amendments that I don't think have the needed focus. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:22 pm
If you are going to play best learn to play well, because if you make a single wrong move it can ruin everything for the cause of freedom.Law professor Randy Barnett makes the case as to why the health care reform legislation signed by the president is unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 9:54 am
At Reason TV (video), Randy Barnett discusses (among other things) “why Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was right to apologize for her critical remarks about” Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 9:27 am
Georgia and Popular Sovereignty by Randy Barnett. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:58 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Randy Barnett (one of the first to question the constitutionality of the health care law) discusses the Obama Administration’s efforts to defend the individual insurance mandate as an exercise of Congress’s taxing power; he concludes that the implications of upholding the insurance mandate under that power “are so sweeping and dangerous that I doubt a majority of the Court would adopt” it. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:01 am
 The Volokh Conspiracy has three new posts: Orin Kerr speculates that there is only one vote on the Court to overturn The Slaughter-House Cases of 1873 (Justice Thomas); David Bernstein outlines how he would argue the issue to convince other Justices to overturn; and Randy Barnett questions Kerr’s predicted vote count. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 4:00 pm
Barnett, Georgetown Law professor Alan B. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:46 pm
It brings together such otherwise disparate people as social conservative lawprof John Eastman (longtime chair of the Practice Group Executive Committee), and libertarians like co-blogger Randy Barnett and myself. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
And the Constitution Daily blog of the National Constitution Center reports on a panel discussion on the Commerce Clause, in which Jack Balkin and Randy Barnett discussed the health care litigation. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
Second, Randy Barnett (the leading figure in libertarian legal theory) embraced originalism in an influential article entitled An Originalism for Nonoriginalists. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:04 pm
As various commentators, including co-blogger Randy Barnett, have pointed out, it is strange that four conservative justices supposedly committed to originalism should take this approach in the face of overwhelming evidence that the Bill of Rights was originally intended to be incorporated under the P or I Clause. [read post]
