Search for: "Riley v State" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
” In a post at Harmless Error, Luke Rioux compares the Court’s recent decision in Riley v California, holding that police must generally obtain a warrant to search an arrestee’s cellphone, with last year’s decision in Maryland v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
, heard 15 and 16 June 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Riley v Murray, heard 10 to 12 May 2021 (Nicklin J) Lloyd v Google, heard 28 and 29 April 2021 (UKSC) Kumlin v Jonsson, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
9 May 2013, 4:59 am by Eric Alexander
Novartis and saw that the learned intermediary doctrine was followed in Montana, thought about the rejection of the heeding presumption in Riley v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:19 pm
This morning, the Sixth Circuit handed down a new case, United States v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 16 May 2024, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia handed down judgment in Martin v Riley, 2024 BCCA 194 (CanLII). [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
The report, a first of its kind, found that existing surveillance law is being eroded by six factors: the introduction of new laws that expand state surveillance powers; lack of legal precision and privacy safeguards in existing surveillance legislation; increased supply of new surveillance technologies that enable illegitimate surveillance; state agencies regularly conducting surveillance outside of what is permitted in law; impunity for those committing illegitimate acts of… [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
 The Supreme Court has held firm that there is a strong boundary between privacy and security, upholding the strength of the Fourth Amendment with limitations (Riley v California) . [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm by CAPTAIN
Hayes, Lisa Lehner, Christine Lopez-Acevedo, Louis V. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 7:14 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
It is said that the law cannot keep pace with society, evolving about twenty years slower than the culture, but even the United States Supreme Court has caught on to the uniqueness of the modern “cell phone,” calling the devices “minicomputers that also happen to have the capacity to be used as a telephone” in a landmark case last year called Riley v. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
Susan Landau, a professor of Cybersecurity Policy at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, analyzed Riley v. [read post]