Search for: "STATE v COOL" Results 1021 - 1040 of 1,411
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2019, 10:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  This is cool if you like Lochner, not cool if you don’t. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:29 pm by Ari Waldman
Would the severability clause – which, a friend reminded me, is not always sacroscant (United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by Daniel Richardson
 Here, Appellee wanted to see the Town of Manchester’s state property tax adjustment report, or as the cool kids in the know call it, the Town of Manchester’s “HS-122. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 7:23 am
" 12:40: Sotomayor seems much more cool and easygoing today. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 1:41 pm
A new decision by the Washington State Court of Appeals brings this question to the fore, State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The first notified in the Official Gazette, on 28th February, removes the bar on ex-Chairpersons and Members of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) from being appointed to any other position under the Government.[1] The only saving grace is that a cooling period of two years is stipulated for them before getting another appointment. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:06 am by Dan Markel
California: From a Revolutionary Constitutional Doctrine to a Modest Ban on Status Crimes *Erik Luna (Washington and Lee University) The Story of Berry: When Hot Blood Cools *Susan D. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral… [read post]