Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 17,240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2023, 5:16 am
One of those defendants was actually acquitted of all three conspiracy counts charged. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:07 am
Relying principally on Sternberg v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 12:28 pm
United States. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:29 pm
State v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
But I count the case as a modest victory. [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:04 am
State v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:15 am
”), appellant, guilty of two counts of second-degree attempted rape, sexual abuse of a minor, two counts of third-degree sexual offense, sodomy, two counts of second-degree child abuse, and second-degree […] The post ASHTON S. v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:03 am
The post VIDAL CORADO-QUINTANILLA v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:00 pm
In Price v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:48 am
The post MAUSEAN CARTER v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 11:43 am
Ontario (“Working Families I”) and Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:21 am
For example, in the securities law context, a Second Circuit panel upheld the SEC’s Regulation Best Interest, but only after finding that a private plaintiff—not the state plaintiffs—had Article III standing (See, XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 6:30 am
The Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project, which seeks to measure democracy globally, identified eight countries in 2022 that “bounced back” from authoritarianism after having previously made democratic gains. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:00 am
In the case of Boyd v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:21 am
The post STATE OF MARYLAND v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Constitutional avoidance says that, when faced with competing interpretations of a statute, courts should choose the one that does not render it unconstitutional.Georgetown Law Professor Brian Galle has recently suggested constitutional avoidance as a basis for his view that Treasury securities held by the Federal Reserve should not count as “outstanding” for purposes of the debt ceiling. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:28 am
For example, in People v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:28 am
For example, in People v. [read post]
