Search for: "STATE v MURPHY" Results 1021 - 1040 of 2,304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2008, 9:10 am
Absent a specific request for coverage not already in a client's policy, or the existence of a special relationship with the client, an insurance agent or broker has no continuing duty to advise, guide or direct a client to obtain additional coverage (see Murphy v Kuhn, supra; JKT Construction v United States Liab. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 10:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Potential for Tribal Control of Sports Gambling After Murphy v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 5:24 am by Diane Marie Amann
(It has 173 states parties, and the same 3 state signatories.) [read post]