Search for: "STATE v. BUSH"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 4,536
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2018, 1:17 pm
A lead agency ‘need not investigate every conceivable environmental problem’ during the course of SEQRA review (Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 307 [2009]), and ‘generalized community objections or speculative environmental consequences’ are not sufficient to establish a SEQRA violation (Matter of Village of Chestnut Ridge v Town of Ramapo, 99 AD3d 918, 925-926 [2012] [internal citations… [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Bush (ruling that U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear detainees’ habeas petitions), Hamdi v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:33 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Bush? [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Justice Anthony Kennedy In Boumediene et al. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:01 pm
” Or, after Lee v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:27 am
Not only do you need 2/3 supermajority in both Houses of Congress, you are defeated if one house in the legislature of 13 states says no. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court has acknowledged, most recently in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:50 am
” United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 1:10 pm
The Court held that Supreme Court precedent, Kirby v.Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 (1972) and United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 8:20 am
" United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Richard Hasen suggests that by answering “no, with no explanation,” to “Pennsylvania Republicans’ calls to put on hold the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s order redrawing the state’s congressional district lines to cure a partisan gerrymander,” “the Court dodged a question it has refused to wade into since the disputed 2000 presidential election culminating in the Court’s… [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:14 pm
Obama and Al-Odah v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am
Bush, in which the Supreme Court ruled that “detainees who were brought [to Guantanamo Bay] involuntarily were entitled under the Constitution to seek habeas corpus relief because ‘[i]n every practical sense Guantanamo is not abroad; it is within the constant jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:47 am
Bush. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
Bush, allowing Guantánamo detainees to challenge the legality of their detention. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:13 am
True, Justice Anthony Kennedy in Boumediene v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 12:01 am
Bush in 2003. [read post]
