Search for: "STATE v. CARTER"
Results 1021 - 1040
of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm
During Jimmy Carter’s term in office, 41 female judges were appointed to the federal judiciary. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
Carter Phillips also faced some tough issues on the comparison issue. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 10:57 am
Carter v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:19 am
BUNN, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 6:34 am
Examining Judge Sotomayor's years as a New York state prosecutor Examining Judge Sotomayor's criminal justice record [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
“In 1989, this Court considered a claim against the State in Sweeney v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Godard v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 9:08 pm
On the Florida Bar’s side are pro-democracy reform groups, historians of judicial elections, professors of law and political science, groups that are strong foes of the influence of money in politics, eleven states with similar solicitation bans, state and local judicial reform organizations, the Conference of Chief Justices [of the states], former Florida chief justices and bar leaders, the American Bar Association (which advocates such a ban in its code of judicial… [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:37 pm
Saunier v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 11:51 am
Carter, 390 So. 2d 816, 817 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1980). [read post]
24 Feb 2025, 12:46 pm
United States and Shah v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 5:37 am
This is one of many interesting free speech questions raised in Carter v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 12:42 pm
§ 1983 fails to state explicitly that punitive damages can be awarded. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:59 pm
In the 1871 case of United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
However, if a neutral is available, the CanLII source identification is unnecessary and should be omitted: Carter v Canada, 2015 SCC 5. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 5:00 pm
The next year, in Carter v. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 4:31 am
Carter v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:51 am
As the case was filed before commencement of the special session it should have been dismissed if filed in Federal Court just like Carter v. [read post]
